<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati Favorites Spam - Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/</link>
	<description>Learn unique website marketing strategies taught by the young entrepreneur Collin LaHay</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Technorati Sucks &#124; Make Money Blogging</title>
		<link>http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati Sucks &#124; Make Money Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>[...] seem to do anything about it, so as you can guess, the spammers evolved their techniques into a more hostile spamming campaign. Keyword spammers seem to have also taken siege, and I have not heard about any new features coming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seem to do anything about it, so as you can guess, the spammers evolved their techniques into a more hostile spamming campaign. Keyword spammers seem to have also taken siege, and I have not heard about any new features coming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Schaffer</title>
		<link>http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Schaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>I would imagine they are at least "planning" to try something.  While there has certainly been little to no real action taken, I have a feeling in the next month or so, as the problem get worse, we might see something happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would imagine they are at least &#8220;planning&#8221; to try something.  While there has certainly been little to no real action taken, I have a feeling in the next month or so, as the problem get worse, we might see something happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robojiannis</title>
		<link>http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>robojiannis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>Technorati needs some serious competition. For a web 2.0 service, it's complete un-web 2.0. Usability, design, navigation, implementation are the worse ever!
And now this spam story comes out...Who would have thought, it could get worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati needs some serious competition. For a web 2.0 service, it&#8217;s complete un-web 2.0. Usability, design, navigation, implementation are the worse ever!<br />
And now this spam story comes out&#8230;Who would have thought, it could get worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binh Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Binh Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collinlahay.com/2008/01/21/technorati-favorites-spam-part-2/#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>When being too famous they forget to maintain their image. That's what is going to happen not only to Technorati but also Google.

First is to ignore user queries because too many users and too less staffs.

Second is to lack on maintaining the quality of the product and as we know... now change = reducing value. When others proceed, you don't, = you go backward = you loose.

I'm not active enough to compete with those spammers who only spend time on spamming. I guess most of us don't have that effort.

So we just have to rely on quality content and good Google ranking for the quality traffic.

Sad? Should not feel sad. I don't use Technorati.

Cheers,
Binh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When being too famous they forget to maintain their image. That&#8217;s what is going to happen not only to Technorati but also Google.</p>
<p>First is to ignore user queries because too many users and too less staffs.</p>
<p>Second is to lack on maintaining the quality of the product and as we know&#8230; now change = reducing value. When others proceed, you don&#8217;t, = you go backward = you loose.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not active enough to compete with those spammers who only spend time on spamming. I guess most of us don&#8217;t have that effort.</p>
<p>So we just have to rely on quality content and good Google ranking for the quality traffic.</p>
<p>Sad? Should not feel sad. I don&#8217;t use Technorati.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Binh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
